Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487207›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Universal promoter scanning by Pol II during transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Chenxi Qiu, Huiyan Jin, Irina Vvedenskaya, Jordi Abante Llenas, Tingting Zhao, Indranil Malik, Alex M Visbisky, Scott L Schwartz, Ping Cui, Pavel Čabart and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ATAC-seq and MNase-seq Detect Distinct Modes of Chromatin Accessibility.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Core promoterome of barley embryo.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. mRNA initiation and termination are spatially coordinated.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Chenxi QiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA.
Huiyan JinDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA.
Irina VvedenskayaWaksman Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Jordi Abante LlenasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3128, USA.
Tingting ZhaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Indranil MalikDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA.
Alex M VisbiskyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Scott L SchwartzGenomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Ping CuiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA.
Pavel ČabartDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA.
Kang Hoo HanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
William K M LaiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Richard P MetzGenomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Charles D JohnsonGenomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Sing-Hoi SzeDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA.
B Franklin PughDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Bryce E NickelsWaksman Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Craig D KaplanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA. craig.kaplan@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-695X
Pennsylvania State University · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCharles University · CZJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Transcription: Mechanism and RegulationR35GM118059 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI NICKELS, BRYCE EDWARD · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
Mechanism and Regulation of RNA Polymerase II ElongationR01GM097260 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPLAN, CRAIG · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
"Mechanisms of RNA Polymerase II initiation"R01GM120450 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPLAN, CRAIG · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
In Vivo Studies of Abortive InitiationR01GM088343 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI NICKELS, BRYCE EDWARD · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088343NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097260NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120450NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of eukaryotic promoters utilize multiple transcription start sites (TSSs). How multiple TSSs are specified at individual promoters across eukaryotes is not understood for most species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a pre-initiation complex (PIC) comprised of Pol II and conserved general transcription factors (GTFs) assembles and opens DNA upstream of TSSs. Evidence from model promoters indicates that the PIC scans from upstream to downstream to identify TSSs. Prior results suggest that TSS distributions at promoters where scanning occurs shift in a polar fashion upon alteration in Pol II catalytic activity or GTF function.

resultsTo determine the extent of promoter scanning across promoter classes in S. cerevisiae, we perturb Pol II catalytic activity and GTF function and analyze their effects on TSS usage genome-wide. We find that alterations to Pol II, TFIIB, or TFIIF function widely alter the initiation landscape consistent with promoter scanning operating at all yeast promoters, regardless of promoter class. Promoter architecture, however, can determine the extent of promoter sensitivity to altered Pol II activity in ways that are predicted by a scanning model.

conclusionsOur observations coupled with previous data validate key predictions of the scanning model for Pol II initiation in yeast, which we term the shooting gallery. In this model, Pol II catalytic activity and the rate and processivity of Pol II scanning together with promoter sequence determine the distribution of TSSs and their usage.

Indexed as

Transcription Initiation, GeneticTranscription Initiation SiteDNA Polymerase IIModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTranscription Factors, GeneralDNA Polymerase IITranscription Factors, General

Identifiers

PMID32487207
PMCPMC7265651
OpenAlexW3031895491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.