Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487113›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

PITChing (professional organisations, innovative trial designs and collaborative approach) for evidence generation for proton therapy.

Srinivas Chilukuri, Pankaj Kumar Panda, Rakesh Jalali

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srinivas ChilukuriApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India. drsrinivas_c@apollohospitals.com.
Pankaj Kumar PandaApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
Rakesh JalaliApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
Apollo Proton Cancer Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in the field of proton beam therapy (PBT) have recently crossed the tipping point wherein the modality is now more versatile than ever before, with possibilities and likely indications expanding rapidly.However the pace of evidence generation lags behind the developments in the field.Generating quality evidence has its own set of challenges owing to complexities of conducting randomized controlled trials, which are the hallmark of level 1 evidence generation.Here we discuss various challenges to clinical evidence generation in PBT and have suggested certain solutions including collaborative approaches and alternative study designs to mitigate these challenges.

Indexed as

Intersectoral CollaborationSocietiesHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsProton TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID32487113
PMCPMC7268635
OpenAlexW3032556727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.