ArticleBMC public health2020
Sitting, standing and moving during work and leisure among male and female office workers of different age: a compositional data analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Two Randomized and Controlled Multi-Component Interventions Focusing On 24-Hour Movement Behavior among Office Workers: A Compositional Data Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- A comparison of task-based and job-based estimation of physical behavior compositions in grocery store workers.Annals of work exposures and health · 2026Article
- Framework for Health-Promoting Environments for Office Workers: Photovoice Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- How infants learn (to walk): Transitions are a fundamental component of practice.Developmental psychology · 2026Article
- Differences in the temporal patterns of occupational time on feet and sitting between homecare and nursing home workers.Annals of work exposures and health · 2025Article
- Does the intervention approach matter for improving 24-hour physical behaviours among overweight and obese Brazilian office workers?BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Physical work environment in an activity-based flex office: a longitudinal case study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- The prevalence of sedentary behavior among university students in Saudi Arabia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Hybrid office work in women and men: do directly measured physical behaviors differ between days working from home and days working at the office?Annals of work exposures and health · 2023Article
- Analysing time-use composition as dependent variables in physical activity and sedentary behaviour research: different compositional data analysis approaches.Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors · 2023Article
- Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Adults from Penafiel, Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and sleep among office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Brazil and Sweden.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Sex-specific aspects of venous thromboembolism: What is new and what is next?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Review
- Physical Behaviours in Brazilian Office Workers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Compared to before the Pandemic: A Compositional Data Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Working from home during the COVID-19 outbreak in Sweden: effects on 24-h time-use in office workers.BMC public health · 2021Observational
- Cultural adaptation, translation and validation of the Spanish version of Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers-An Exploratory Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGendered patterns of physical activity behaviours may help explaining health inequalities between men and women. However, evidence on such patterns in the working population is sparse. This study aimed at documenting and comparing compositions of sitting, standing and moving at work and during leisure among male and female office workers of different age.
methodsSitting (including lying), standing and moving were measured using accelerometry for, on average, four working days in 55 male and 57 female Swedish office workers. Behaviours were described in terms of time spent in four exhaustive categories: sitting in short (< 30 min) and long (≥30 min) bouts, standing, and moving. In a compositional data analysis approach, isometric log-ratios (ilr) were calculated for time sitting relative to non-sitting, time in short relative to long sitting bouts, and time in standing relative to moving. Differences between genders (men vs. women), domains (work vs. leisure), and according to age were examined for each ilr using ANOVA.
resultsAt work, time spent sitting in short bouts, sitting in long bouts, standing, and moving was, on average, 29, 43, 21 and 7% among men, and 28, 38, 26 and 7% among women. Corresponding proportions during leisure were 34, 27, 27 and 13% among men and 28, 27, 32 and 13% among women. Men spent more time sitting relative to non-sitting ([Formula: see text] =0.04, p = 0.03) than women, and less time standing relative to moving ([Formula: see text] =0.07, p = 0.01). At work compared to during leisure, both genders spent more time sitting relative to non-sitting ([Formula: see text] =0.47, p < 0.01); within sitting more time was spent in long relative to short sitting bouts ([Formula: see text] =0.26, p < 0.01), and within non-sitting, more time was spent standing than moving ([Formula: see text] =0.12, p < 0.01). Older workers spent less of their non-sitting time moving than younger workers ([Formula: see text] =0.07, p = 0.01).
conclusionMale office workers spent more time sitting relative to non-sitting than female workers, and more time moving relative to standing. Both genders were sitting more at work than during leisure. Older workers moved less than younger. These workers could likely benefit from interventions to reduce or break up prolonged sitting time, preferably by moving more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.