Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487100›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

Predicting survival in melanoma patients treated with concurrent targeted- or immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy : Melanoma brain metastases prognostic score.

Jana Schaule, Stephanie G C Kroeze, Oliver Blanck, Susanne Stera, Klaus H Kahl, Falk Roeder, Stephanie E Combs, David Kaul, An Claes, Markus M Schymalla and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 18 institutions in 5 countries.

Jana SchauleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. jana.schaule@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-0980
Stephanie G C KroezeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver BlanckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Susanne SteraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Klaus H KahlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Falk RoederDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
David KaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
An ClaesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Markus M SchymallaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sonja AdebahrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisgau, Germany.
Franziska EckertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian LohausGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Nasrin Abbasi-SengerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Guido HenkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Marcella SzuecsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael GeierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria.
Nora SundahlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Daniel BuergyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Reinhard DummerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEGhent University Hospital · BEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEJena University Hospital · DEKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATLMU Klinikum · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Varian Medical Systems NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma patients frequently develop brain metastases. The most widely used score to predict survival is the molGPA based on a mixed treatment of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). In addition, systemic therapy was not considered. We therefore aimed to evaluate the performance of the molGPA score in patients homogeneously treated with SRT and concurrent targeted therapy or immunotherapy (TT/IT).

methodsThis retrospective analysis is based on an international multicenter database (TOaSTT) of melanoma patients treated with TT/IT and concurrent (≤30 days) SRT for brain metastases between May 2011 and May 2018. Overall survival (OS) was studied using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank testing. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed to analyze prognostic factors for OS.

resultsOne hundred ten patients were analyzed. 61, 31 and 8% were treated with IT, TT and with a simultaneous combination, respectively. A median of two brain metastases were treated per patient. After a median follow-up of 8 months, median OS was 8.4 months (0-40 months). The molGPA score was not associated with OS. Instead, cumulative brain metastases volume, timing of metastases (syn- vs. metachronous) and systemic therapy with concurrent IT vs. TT influenced OS significantly. Based on these parameters, the VTS score (volume-timing-systemic therapy) was established that stratified patients into three groups with a median OS of 5.1, 18.9 and 34.5 months, respectively (p = 0.001 and 0.03).

conclusionThe molGPA score was not useful for this cohort of melanoma patients undergoing local therapy for brain metastases taking into account systemic TT/IT. For these patients, we propose a prognostic VTS score, which needs to be validated prospectively.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyPrognosisRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBrain metastasesImmunotherapyMelanomamolGPAStereotacticTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32487100
PMCPMC7268472
OpenAlexW3116372375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.