Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487065›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Effects of an mHealth voice message service (mMitra) on maternal health knowledge and practices of low-income women in India: findings from a pseudo-randomized controlled trial.

Nirmala Murthy, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Muthu Perumal Prakash, Aakash Ganju, Joanne Peter, Nadi Kaonga, Patricia Mechael

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nirmala MurthyFoundation for Research in Health Systems, #G-1, Brigade Business Suites, 10th Main, Jayanagar 2nd Block, Bengaluru, 560011, India.
Subhashini ChandrasekharanHealthEnabled, Unit D11 Westlake Square, Westlake Drive, Westlake, Cape Town, 7945, South Africa.
Muthu Perumal PrakashFoundation for Research in Health Systems, G2, 5/26 Pillayar Kovil Street, Medavakkam, Chennai, 600100, India.
Aakash GanjuSaat Health, 1103, Glencroft, Hiranandani Gardens, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Joanne PeterJohnson & Johnson, 241 Main Road, Retreat, Cape Town, 7945, South Africa.
Nadi KaongaHealthEnabled, Unit D11 Westlake Square, Westlake Drive, Westlake, Cape Town, 7945, South Africa.
Patricia MechaelHealthEnabled, Unit D11 Westlake Square, Westlake Drive, Westlake, Cape Town, 7945, South Africa. pmechael@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1034-0549
Foundation for Research in Health Systems · INNational Institutes of Health · USTufts University · USWestlake Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile Health (mHealth) is becoming an important tool to improve health outcomes in maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH). Studies of mHealth interventions, have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving uptake of recommended maternal services such as antenatal visits. However, evidence of impact on maternal health outcomes is still limited.

methodsA pseudo-randomized controlled trial (single blind) was conducted to assess the impact of a voice-message based maternal intervention on maternal health knowledge, attitudes, practices and outcomes over time: Pregnancy (baseline/Time 1); Post-partum (Time 2) and when the infant turned one year old (Time 3). Women assigned to the mMitra intervention arm received gestational age- and stage-based educational voice messages via mobile phone in Hindi and Marathi, while those assigned to the control group did not. Both groups received standard care.

resultsTwo thousand sixteen women were enrolled. Interviews were conducted with 1516 women in the intervention group and 500 women in the control group at baseline and post-partum. The intervention group performed significantly better than controls on four maternal health practice indicators: receiving the tetanus toxoid injection (OR: 1.6, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.05-2.4, p = 0.028), consulting a doctor if spotting or bleeding (OR: 1.72, 95%CI: 1.07-2.75, p = 0.025), saving money for delivery expenses (OR: 1.79, 95%CI: 1.38-2.33, p = 0.0001), and delivering in hospital (OR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.49-4.35, p = 0.001). The control group performed significantly better than the intervention group on two practice indicators: resting regularly during pregnancy (OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.54-0.88, p = 0.002) and having at-home deliveries attended by a skilled birth attendant (OR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23-0.91, p = 0.027). Both groups' knowledge improved from Time 1 to Time 2. Only one knowledge indicator, on seeking medical care during pregnancy, was statistically increased in the intervention group compared to controls. Anemia status at or near the time of delivery was unable to be assessed due to missing data from maternal health cards.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that in low-resource settings, mobile voice messages providing tailored and timed information about pregnancy can positively impact maternal health care practices proven to improve maternal health outcomes. Additional research is needed to assess whether voice messaging can motivate behavior change better than text messaging, particularly in low literacy settings.

trial registrationThe mMitra impact evaluation is registered with ISRCTN under Registration # 88968111, assigned on 6 September 2018 (See https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN88968111).

Indexed as

Text MessagingAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMothersPatient Education as TopicPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicLow- and middle-income countriesMaternal care knowledgeMaternal care practicesmHealthVoice messaging

Identifiers

PMID32487065
PMCPMC7268375
OpenAlexW3031137733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.