Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487063›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2020

Right ventricular function parameters in pulmonary hypertension: echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance.

Anna Werther Evaldsson, Anthony Lindholm, Raluca Jumatate, Annika Ingvarsson, Gustav Jan Smith, Johan Waktare, Göran Rådegran, Anders Roijer, Carl Meurling, Ellen Ostenfeld

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Non-Invasive Approach to Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Right ventricular dyssynchrony predicts outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension when assessed in multiple cardiac magnetic resonance views.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Werther EvaldssonLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. anna.werther_evaldsson@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-7199
Anthony LindholmLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Raluca JumatateLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Annika IngvarssonLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Gustav Jan SmithLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Johan WaktareLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Göran RådegranLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Anders RoijerLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Carl MeurlingLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ellen OstenfeldLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRight ventricular (RV) function is a major determinant of outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is gold standard to assess RV ejection fraction (RVEF

methodsFifty-five patients (37 women, 62 ± 15 years) evaluated for pulmonary hypertension underwent CMR and echocardiography. AVPD

resultsA strong correlation was demonstrated for FAC whereas the remaining measurements showed moderate correlation. The absolute bias for S' was 2.4 ± 3.0 cm/s (relative bias 24.1 ± 28.3%), TAPSE/AVPD

conclusionThis study has demonstrated a moderate to strong correlation of regional CMR measurements to corresponding echocardiographic measures. However, biases and to some extent wide limits of agreement, exist between the modalities. Consequently, the equivalent measures are not interchangeable at least in patients with pulmonary hypertension. The echocardiographic parameter that showed best correlation with RVEF

Indexed as

EchocardiographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineStroke VolumeVentricular Function, RightAgedFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesVentricular Dysfunction, RightCardiac magnetic resonanceEchocardiographyRight ventricular functionValidation study

Identifiers

PMID32487063
PMCPMC7268227
OpenAlexW3031856042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.