Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487058›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Trends in the consumption rates of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in the health region of Lleida from 2002 to 2015.

F Torres-Bondia, J de Batlle, L Galván, M Buti, F Barbé, G Piñol-Ripoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-term benzodiazepine prescriptions in community psychiatry clinics.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F Torres-BondiaPharmacy Department, Clinical Neuroscience Research, IRBLleida, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain.
J de BatlleBiomedical Research Networking Center in Respiratory Diseases (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
L GalvánPharmacy Department, Servei Català de la Salut (Catalan Health Services), Lleida, Spain.
M ButiUnitat d'Avaluació Clínica (Clinical Evaluation Unit), Institut Català de la Salut (Catalan Institute of Health), Lleida, Spain.
F BarbéBiomedical Research Networking Center in Respiratory Diseases (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
G Piñol-RipollUnitat Trastorns Cognitius (Cognitive Disorders Unit), Clinical Neuroscience Research, IRBLleida, Santa Maria University Hospital, Rovira Roure n° 44, 25198, Lleida, Spain. gerard_437302@hotmail.com.

Funding

Generalitat de Catalunya (ES) PERIS 2016: SLT002/16/00364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high prevalence and long-term use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) treatment are debated topics because of the risk they can cause to the patients. Despite the current information on the risk-benefit balance of these drugs, their consumption remains particularly high. We determined the trend in the consumption prevalence of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and drugs related to BZDs (Z-drugs) in the population of the Health Region of Lleida to explore patterns of use and the associated characteristics associated between 2002 and 2015.

methodsAn analysis of secular trends was carried out between 2002 and 2015; the databased included all individuals from the Health Region of Lleida, which had 358,157 inhabitants in 2015, that consumed BZDs. The consumption of BZDs was evaluated using prescription billing data from the Public Health System. All types of BZDs and BZD analogues that had been approved by the drug agency were included. Trends by age and sex were investigated.

resultsOver the whole study period, a total of 161,125 individuals accounted for 338,148 dispensations. Overall, 59% were women, and the mean age was 56 years. The dispensing prevalence of BZDs use in 2015 was 14.2% overall -18.8% in women and 9.6% in men-and was 36% in those over 65 years. According to the half-life of BZDs, the prevalence of short-intermediate BZD use, intermediate-long BZD use, and Z-drugs use was 9.7, 5.5 and 0.8%, respectively. The evolution of the annual prevalence of BZD dispensing showed a progressive decline, from 15.3% in 2002 to 14.2% in 2015, which was attributed to a decrease in the consumption of intermediate-long half-life BZDs (8.0% vs. 5.5%) and Z-drugs (1.4% vs. 0.8%).

conclusionThe dispensing prevalence of BZDs and Z-drugs was high, although a small reduction was observed during this time period. The dispensing prevalence was especially high in the population over 65, despite the risk of cognitive decline and falls. Integral actions are required to lower the BZD prescription rate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenzodiazepinesDrug UtilizationFemaleForecastingHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'SpainYoung AdultBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesBenzodiazepinesDrug safetyDrug utilizationPrescribing trendsSedative-hypnotics

Identifiers

PMID32487058
PMCPMC7268471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.