Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487039›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Working memory and decision making in children with ADHD: an analysis of delay discounting with the use of the dual-task paradigm.

Rosa Angela Fabio, Marilla Bianco, Tindara Caprì, Flavia Marino, Liliana Ruta, David Vagni, Giovanni Pioggia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05879198 (Train Your Brain), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05879198 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Train Your Brain: A Pilot Project to Improve Memory and Decision Making to Improve Outcomes Among Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2023 to 2023Enrolled23ConditionsBehavior, HealthArmsComputer-based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Animal Models of ADHD?Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa Angela FabioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Marilla BiancoItalian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Tindara CaprìDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Flavia MarinoCNR-IRIB, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council of Italy, via Torre Bianca, Mortelle, Messina, Italy.
Liliana RutaCNR-IRIB, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council of Italy, via Torre Bianca, Mortelle, Messina, Italy.
David VagniCNR-IRIB, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council of Italy, via Torre Bianca, Mortelle, Messina, Italy. david.vagni@cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8306-6272
Giovanni PioggiaCNR-IRIB, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council of Italy, via Torre Bianca, Mortelle, Messina, Italy.
Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeficits in working memory tasks have been widely documented in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of working memory load in impulsivity during decision-making processes. A delayed discounting (DD) paradigm was used, comparing children with ADHD and age-matched controls.

methodThirty-two children equally divided between typically developing and ADHD, from 8 to 10 years of age were assigned to sessions of a dual-task paradigm. In the primary task the child has to choose between two different amounts of money at different time delays, while in the secondary task the child has to repeat a random series of digits with different lengths. The experiment was conducted in a school setting.

resultsCompared to peers with typical development, delayed discounting was significantly stronger in children with ADHD and discounting rates increased in both groups for heavier memory loads. Furthermore, the memory load impact on frequency of immediate rewards was stronger in children with ADHD compared to typically developing children. DISCUSSION: Results are discussed in terms of the relation between working memory load and decision-making processes, their impact on impulsive behaviour in ADHD and the need for future research to understand possible neurocognitive correlates and use that information to develop better inclusive policies.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingMemory, Short-TermAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleRewardADHDCognitive loadDecision-makingDelayed discountingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32487039
PMCPMC7268601
OpenAlexW3032437143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.