Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32487036›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer.

Vladimir Druel, Laetitia Gimenez, Kim Paricaud, Jean-Pierre Delord, Pascale Grosclaude, Nathalie Boussier, Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vladimir DruelDepartment of Primary Care, University of Toulouse, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France. vladimir.druel@dumg-toulouse.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-2122
Laetitia GimenezDepartment of Primary Care, University of Toulouse, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France.
Kim ParicaudDepartment of Internal Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, 29 Rue Emile Lecrivain, 31077, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Pierre DelordPaul Sabatier University, Toulouse III, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France.
Pascale GrosclaudeInserm U1027, Faculty of Medicine, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31073, Toulouse, France.
Nathalie BoussierDepartment of Primary Care, University of Toulouse, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France.
Marie-Eve Rougé BugatDepartment of Primary Care, University of Toulouse, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-5815
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients suffering from cancers are increasingly numerous in general practice consultations. The General Practitioner (GP) should be at the heart of the management of patients. Several studies have examined the perceptions of GPs confronted with the patient suffering from cancer and the relationships of GPs with oncologists, but few studies have focused on the patients' perspective. We studied the three-way relationship between the oncologist, the GP, and the patient, from the patient's point of view.

methodsA questionnaire validated by a group consisting of GPs, oncologists, nurses, an epidemiologist and quality analyst, was administered over a three-week period to patients suffering from cancer receiving chemotherapy in a day hospital.

resultsThe analysis was based on 403 questionnaires. Patients had confidence in the GP's knowledge of oncology in 88% of cases; 49% consulted their GP for pain, 15% for cancer-related advice, and 44% in emergencies. Perceived good GP/oncologist communication led patients to turn increasingly to their GP for cancer-related consultations (RR = 1.14; p = 0.01) and gave patients confidence in the GP's ability to manage cancer-related problems (RR = 1.30; p < 0.01). Mention by the oncologist of the GP's role increased the consultations for complications (RR = 1.82; p < 0.01) as well as recourse to the GP in an emergency (RR = 1.35; p < 0.01).

conclusionPatients suffering from cancer considered that the GP was competent, but did not often consult their GP for cancer-related problems. There is a discrepancy between patients' beliefs and their behaviour. When the oncologist spoke to patients of the GP's role, patients had recourse to their GP more often. Systematically integrating a GP consultation to conclude cancer diagnosis disclosure, could improve management and care coordination.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPatient Care TeamReferral and ConsultationCancerCommunicationDisclosureGeneral practitionerOncologist

Identifiers

PMID32487036
PMCPMC7268533
OpenAlexW3030304350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.