ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2020
The Impact of Different Screening Model Structures on Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality Predictions: The Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction (MCLIR) Methodology.
Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal cervical cancer screening strategies for unvaccinated and HPV-vaccinated cohorts in the United States: a comprehensive comparative modeling analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Projected Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Uterine Cancer in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the United States: a modeling study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the U.S.: A modeling study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- [Prostate cancer screening? Only evidence-based, risk-adjusted, and organized!]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Review
- The Impact of Model Assumptions on Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
- Revisiting the standard blueprint for biomarker development to address emerging cancer early detection technologies.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Review
- Using simulation modeling to guide policy to reduce disparities and achieve equity in cancer outcomes: state of the science and a road map for the future.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness models for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: IPECAD modeling workshop cross-comparison challenge.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Article
- Article
- Health impacts of COVID-19 disruptions to primary cervical screening by time since last screen: A model-based analysis for current and future disruptions.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.