Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32486484›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Wine Consumption and Oral Cavity Cancer: Friend or Foe, Two Faces of Janus.

Paula Silva, Norbert Latruffe, Giovanni de Gaetano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wine, Polyphenols, and the Matrix Effect: Is Alcohol Always the Same?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Resveratrol and Wine: An Overview of Thirty Years in the Digital News.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula SilvaLaboratory of Histology and Embryology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira nº228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Norbert LatruffeBioPeroxIL laboratory, Université de Bourgogne, 6, Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France.
Giovanni de GaetanoDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health benefits of moderate wine consumption have been extensively studied during the last few decades. Some studies have demonstrated protective associations between moderate drinking and several diseases including oral cavity cancer (OCC). However, due to the various adverse effects related to ethanol content, the recommendation of moderate wine consumption has been controversial. The polyphenolic components of wine contribute to its beneficial effects with different biological pathways, including antioxidant, lipid regulating and anti-inflammatory effects. On the other hand, in the oral cavity, ethanol is oxidized to form acetaldehyde, a metabolite with genotoxic properties. This review is a critical compilation of both the beneficial and the detrimental effects of wine consumption on OCC.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingWineAcetaldehydeAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsCarcinogenesisDNAEthanolHumansLipidsMouth NeoplasmsMutagensPolyphenolsReactive Nitrogen SpeciesReactive Oxygen SpeciesAcetaldehydeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsDNAEthanolLipidsMutagensPolyphenolsReactive Nitrogen SpeciesReactive Oxygen SpeciesResveratrolacetaldehydecarcinogenesisethanoloral cavity cancerresveratrolwine

Identifiers

PMID32486484
PMCPMC7321235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.