Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32486362›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Attitudes and Opinions of Young Gynecologists on Pregnancy Termination: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey in Poland.

Kornelia Zaręba, Valentina Lucia La Rosa, Ewelina Kołb-Sielecka, Michał Ciebiera, Rosalia Ragusa, Jacek Gierus, Elena Commodari, Grzegorz Jakiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kornelia ZarębaI Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8262-4380
Valentina Lucia La RosaDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 951234 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6619-6777
Ewelina Kołb-SieleckaI Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.
Michał CiebieraII Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5780-5983
Rosalia RagusaHealth Technology Assessment Committee, Health Directorate, University Hospital "G. Rodolico," 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-3438
Jacek GierusFaculty of Psychology, University of Economics and Human Sciences, 01-043 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2532-3327
Elena CommodariDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 951234 Catania, Italy.
Grzegorz JakielI Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aims to explore the attitudes and opinions of a group of Polish young gynecologists toward pregnancy termination.

methodAn anonymous questionnaire was completed by physicians who participated in obligatory trainee courses held in 2019 in Warsaw.

resultsThe study group included 71 physicians with an average age of 29 years (SD 3.05). A considerable number of the physicians accepted terminations for medical reasons up to the end of pregnancy, especially in cases of lethal defects (46%) and a serious disease in the mother (34%). Only 6% of the group of gynecologists not performing terminations claimed that the procedure was contrary to their conscience, and 62% of them stated that such procedures were not performed at their hospital. Terminations would be performed by 90% of the respondents in cases of lethal defects of the fetus and by 80% if severe irreversible fetal defects were diagnosed.

conclusionsThe main problem associated with the inaccessibility of pregnancy termination in Poland is not linked to individuals, meaning medical personnel and the possibility of invoking the conscience clause, but probably to the lack of approval for terminations granted by hospital supervisors. Adequate knowledge on pregnancy termination procedures, fetal defects, and diseases in the mother translated into the changes of opinions on pregnancy terminations.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitude of Health PersonnelGynecologyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePolandPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesabortionattitudesopinionsphysicianspregnancy terminationTOP

Identifiers

PMID32486362
PMCPMC7311986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.