Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32486350›Full record

ArticleVaccines2020

Seasonal Influenza Vaccination and Recommendation: The Difference between General Practitioners and Public Health Workers in China.

Hongguo Rong, Xiaozhen Lai, Xiaochen Ma, Zhiyuan Hou, Shunping Li, Rize Jing, Haijun Zhang, Zhibin Peng, Luzhao Feng, Hai Fang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hongguo RongChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaozhen LaiSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaochen MaChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Zhiyuan HouSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shunping LiSchool of Health Care Management, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Rize JingSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Haijun ZhangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Zhibin PengDivision of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Luzhao FengDivision of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Hai FangChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Peking University · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNFudan University · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M650392National Natural Science Foundation of China 71774006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal influenza vaccination for healthcare workers (HCWs) is critical to the protection of HCWs and their patients. This study examined whether the separation of public health workers and general practitioners could affect the influenza vaccine uptake and recommendation behaviors among HCWs in China. A survey was conducted from August to October 2019, and HCWs from 10 provinces in China were recruited. A self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was used to assess HCWs' demographic information, knowledge, and attitudes toward influenza vaccination, as well as vaccine uptake and recommendation behaviors. The primary outcome was HCWs' vaccination and recommendation status of seasonal influenza vaccine. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the influence factors of influenza vaccine uptake and recommendation among HCWs. Of the 1159 HCWs in this study, 25.3% were vaccinated against influenza in the previous season. "No need to get vaccinated" was the primary reason for both unvaccinated public health workers and general practitioners. Multivariate logistic regression showed that public health workers were more likely to get vaccinated against influenza (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.59-3.05) and recommend influenza vaccination to children (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.57-2.80) and the elderly (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.26-2.25) than general practitioners. Besides, the knowledge and perceived risk of influenza can give rise to HCWs' vaccination and recommendation behaviors, and HCWs who got vaccinated in the past year were more likely to recommend it to children and the elderly in their work. The influenza vaccine coverage and recommendation among HCWs are still relatively low in China, especially for general practitioners. Further efforts are needed to improve the knowledge and attitudes toward influenza and influenza vaccination among HCWs, and coherent training on immunization for both public health workers and general practitioners might be effective in the face of separated public health and clinical services in China.

Indexed as

general practitionersHealthcare workersinfluenzapublic health workersvaccination

Identifiers

PMID32486350
PMCPMC7350002
OpenAlexW3030172185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.