ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
Insight into the Genome of Diverse
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid genome assembly of Penicillium oxalicum UV4 delineates cryptic secondary metabolite pathways and robust lignocellulolytic potential.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- The origin and evolution of HKT proteins with TrkH domain from aquatic plants to flowering plants.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- The Biocontrol and Growth-Promoting Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Occurrence of Moulds and Yeasts in the Slaughterhouse: The Underestimated Role of Fungi in Meat Safety and Occupational Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Potential Medicinal Fungi from Freshwater Environments as Resources of Bioactive Compounds.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hybrid assembly ofIMA fungus · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis Reveals Key Changes in the Genome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Omics-Based Comparison of Fungal Virulence Genes, Biosynthetic Gene Clusters, and Small Molecules inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Near-GaplessJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Avirulent Isolates ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- A comprehensive review on the medicinally valuable endosymbiotic fungi Penicillium chrysogenum.Archives of microbiology · 2023Review
- Review
- Comparative analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The Confusion in Renaming Species: Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium rubens.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- TheJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are eighteen species within the
resultsThe available genomes of several classical and novel
conclusionsThe overall comparison of all available P. chrysogenum genomes indicates that there are a significant number of strain-specific genes, mutations of structural and regulatory genes, gene cluster duplications and DNA fragment translocations. This information provides important leads to improve the biosynthesis of enzymes, antifungal agents, prebiotics or different types of secondary metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.