Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32486225›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2020

Application of Biosensors for Detection of Pathogenic Food Bacteria: A Review.

Athmar A Ali, Ammar B Altemimi, Nawfal Alhelfi, Salam A Ibrahim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Recent developments in waterborne pathogen detection technologies.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025
    Review
  14. Cultivated meat microbiological safety considerations and practices.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Athmar A AliDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Basrah 61001, Iraq.
Ammar B AltemimiDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Basrah 61001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-5988
Nawfal AlhelfiDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Basrah 61001, Iraq.
Salam A IbrahimFood and Nutritional Science Program, North Carolina A & T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of biosensors is considered a novel approach for the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens in food products. Biosensors, which can convert biological, chemical, or biochemical signals into measurable electrical signals, are systems containing a biological detection material combined with a chemical or physical transducer. The objective of this review was to present the effectiveness of various forms of sensing technologies for the detection of foodborne pathogens in food products, as well as the criteria for industrial use of this technology. In this article, the principle components and requirements for an ideal biosensor, types, and their applications in the food industry are summarized. This review also focuses in detail on the application of the most widely used biosensor types in food safety.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesFood SafetyBacteriaFood IndustryFood MicrobiologyATPbioluminescencebiosensorsfoodbornepathogenic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID32486225
PMCPMC7344754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.