Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32486026›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Algae-Bacteria Consortia as a Strategy to Enhance H

Neda Fakhimi, David Gonzalez-Ballester, Emilio Fernández, Aurora Galván, Alexandra Dubini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Applications of the MicroalgaeLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. The MicroalgaeCells · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A polyyne toxin produced by an antagonistic bacterium blinds and lyses a Chlamydomonad alga.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neda FakhimiDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edif. Severo Ochoa, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
David Gonzalez-BallesterDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edif. Severo Ochoa, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Emilio FernándezDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edif. Severo Ochoa, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-5392
Aurora GalvánDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edif. Severo Ochoa, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7564-2281
Alexandra DubiniDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edif. Severo Ochoa, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8825-3915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological hydrogen production by microalgae is a potential sustainable, renewable and clean source of energy. However, many barriers limiting photohydrogen production in these microorganisms remain unsolved. In order to explore this potential and make biohydrogen industrially affordable, the unicellular microalga

Indexed as

Absorption, RadiationBacteriaChlamydomonas reinhardtiiHydrogenOxygenSunlightHydrogenOxygenalgaebacteriabiohydrogenChlamydomonas reinhardtiico-culturesconsortiahydrogen

Identifiers

PMID32486026
PMCPMC7348838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.