ReviewCancers2020
Neoadjuvant Treatment for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Recent Progresses and Challenges.
Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer after a pathologic complete response: does the type of neoadjuvant therapy matter?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Pooled it
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Predictive Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Tumor flare-like response: A novel imaging phenomenon with predictive significance in triple negative breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Trial
- Neoadjuvant talazoparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation-positive, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: exploration of tumor BRCA mutational status.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Trial
- Neoadjuvant Talazoparib in Patients With Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation-Positive, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase II Study.The oncologist · 2023Trial
- RecurIndex-derived molecular features associated with total pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer: An exploratory prospective cohort study with single-cell transcriptomic contextualization.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with triple-negative breast cancer: real world results from Western Kenya.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Article
- NCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Review
- Intratumoral microbiota exhibiting varied responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer revealed by 2bRAD-M.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Differences in Treatment and Survival for Secondary Triple Negative Breast Cancer in Premenopausal Women.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Multicenter Real-World Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Rho/PAK signaling: a key driver of anthracycline and taxane resistance in breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Article
- Mutational Landscape Analysis of BRCA1/2 and Identification of Extracellular-Vesicle-Related Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Development of predictive models for the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer using multiple transcriptomic analyses.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development and verification of a prognostic nomogram model for triple-negative breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The role of AI-driven decision support in immunotherapy for predicting pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer with historically poor outcomes, primarily due to the lack of effective targeted therapies. The tumor molecular heterogeneity of TNBC has been well recognized, yet molecular subtype driven therapy remains lacking. While neoadjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care for early stage TNBC, the optimal chemotherapy regimen is debatable. The addition of carboplatin to anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, and taxane (ACT) regimen is associated with improved complete pathologic response (pCR). Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations significantly increase pCR in TNBC. Increased tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) or the presence of DNA repair deficiency (DRD) mutation is associated with increased pCR. Other targets, such as poly-ADP-ribosyl polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Protein Kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-AKT-mTOR) pathway inhibitors, are being evaluated in the neoadjuvant setting. This review examines recent progress in neoadjuvant therapy of TNBC, including platinum, ICI, PARPi, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) pathway targeted therapies, and novel tumor microenvironment (TME) targeted therapy, in addition to biomarkers for the prediction of pCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.