Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32485830›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Methodological Review of Mixed Methods Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (2014-2019).

Sergi Fàbregues, Quan Nha Hong, Elsa Lucia Escalante-Barrios, Timothy C Guetterman, Julio Meneses, Michael D Fetters

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06310434 (Analysis of COMPASsion and Humanisation of Adolescents Facing the End-of-life Processes), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06310434 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of COMPASsion and Humanisation of Adolescents Facing the End-of-life Processes: a Mixed-method Participatory Project

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRan2024 to 2026Enrolled1,852ConditionsCompassion, Death Anxiety, Adolescent BehaviorArmsquestionnaire, Discussion group, Reflective diary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mixed methods research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sergi FàbreguesDepartment of Psychology and Education, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1141-7613
Quan Nha HongEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), University College London, London WC1H 0NR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2576-5750
Elsa Lucia Escalante-BarriosDepartment of Education, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 0000, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-6733
Timothy C GuettermanGraduate School of Health, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0093-858X
Julio MenesesDepartment of Psychology and Education, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4959-456X
Michael D FettersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8521-5681
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya · ESCreighton University · USUniversidad del Norte · COUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed methods research has been increasingly recognized as a useful approach for describing and explaining complex issues in palliative care and end-of-life research. However, little is known about the use of this methodology in the field and the ways in which mixed methods studies have been reported. The purpose of this methodological review was to examine the characteristics, methodological features and reporting quality of mixed methods articles published in palliative care research. The authors screened all articles published in eight journals specialized in palliative care between January 2014 and April 2019. Those that reported a mixed methods study (n = 159) were included. The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) criteria were used to assess reporting quality. Findings showed that 57.9% of the identified studies used a convergent design and 82.4% mentioned complementarity as their main purpose for using a mixed methods approach. The reporting quality of the articles generally showed a need for improvement as authors usually did not describe the type of mixed methods design used and provided little detail on the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Based on the findings, recommendations are made to improve the quality of reporting of mixed methods articles in palliative care.

Indexed as

Palliative CareTerminal CareHumansend-of-life researchmixed methods researchpalliative care researchqualitative researchquantitative researchreporting qualityresearch design

Identifiers

PMID32485830
PMCPMC7312170
OpenAlexW3029394706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.