Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32485734›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2020

Cardiovascular Benefit of Empagliflozin Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.

Silvio E Inzucchi, Kamlesh Khunti, David H Fitchett, Christoph Wanner, Michaela Mattheus, Jyothis T George, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bernard Zinman

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel Cardiometabolic Medications in the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Era.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025 · on this map
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Silvio E InzucchiSection of Endocrinology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
David H FitchettDivision of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christoph WannerDivision of Nephrology, Würzburg University Clinic, Würzburg, Germany.
Michaela MattheusBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG, Ingelheim, Germany.
Jyothis T GeorgeBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Anne Pernille OfstadBoehringer Ingelheim Norway KS, Asker, Norway.
Bernard ZinmanLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Norway) · NOMount Sinai Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Leicester · GBYale University · US

Funding

Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GERALD I SHULMAN · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextControl of multiple cardiovascular (CV) risk factors reduces CV events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

objectiveTo investigate this association in a contemporary clinical trial population, including how CV risk factor control affects the CV benefits of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

designPost hoc analysis.

settingRandomized CV outcome trial (EMPA-REG OUTCOME).

participantsType 2 diabetes patients with established CV disease.

interventionEmpagliflozin or placebo.

main outcome measuresRisk of CV outcomes-including the treatment effect of empagliflozin-by achieving 7 goals for CV risk factor control at baseline: (1) glycated hemoglobin <7.5%, (2) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL or statin use, (3) systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, (4) pharmacological renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, (5) normoalbuminuria, (6) aspirin use, (7) nonsmoking.

resultsIn the placebo group, the hazard ratio (HR) for CV death was 4.00 (95% CI, 2.26-7.11) and 2.48 (95% CI, 1.52-4.06) for patients achieving only 0-3 or 4-5 risk factor goals at baseline, respectively, compared with those achieving 6-7 goals. Participants achieving 0-3 or 4-5 goals also had increased risk for the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or CV death (excluding fatal stroke) (HR 2.89 [1.82-4.57] and 1.90 [1.31-2.78], respectively) and 3-point major adverse CV events (HR 2.21 [1.53-3.19] and 1.42 [1.06-1.89]). Empagliflozin significantly reduced these outcomes across all risk factor control categories (P > 0.05 for treatment-by-subgroup interactions).

conclusionsCardiovascular risk in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was inversely associated with baseline CV risk factor control. Empagliflozin's cardioprotective effect was consistent regardless of multiple baseline risk factor control.

Indexed as

Heart Disease Risk FactorsAgedBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseCardiotonic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular SystemDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseCardiotonic AgentsempagliflozinGlucosidesGlycated Hemoglobincardioprotectivecardiovascular diseasetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32485734
PMCPMC7382052
OpenAlexW3032880817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.