Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32484813›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Prediction of excess pregnancy weight gain using psychological, physical, and social predictors: A validated model in a prospective cohort study.

Sarah D McDonald, Zhijie Michael Yu, Sherry van Blyderveen, Louis Schmidt, Wendy Sword, Meredith Vanstone, Anne Biringer, Helen McDonald, Joseph Beyene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Coping with Stress in Complicated Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah D McDonaldDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-2178
Zhijie Michael YuDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sherry van BlyderveenEating Disorders Program at Homewood Health Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Louis SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Wendy SwordSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anne BiringerRay D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Helen McDonaldMidwifery Education Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph BeyeneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CAImpact · CAHomewood Research Institute · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-142253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a prediction model for excess pregnancy weight gain using early pregnancy factors.

designProspective cohort study.

settingWe recruited from 12 obstetrical, family medicine, and midwifery centers in Ontario, Canada.

participantsWe recruited English-speaking women with singleton pregnancies between 8+0-20+6 weeks. Of 1296 women approached, 1050 were recruited (81%). Of those, 970 women had complete data (970/1050, 92%) and were recruited at a mean of 14.8 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: We collected data on psychological, physical, and social factors and used stepwise logistic regression analysis to develop a multivariable model predicting our primary outcome of excess pregnancy weight gain, with random selection of 2/3 of women for training data and 1/3 for testing data.

resultsNine variables were included in the final model to predict excess pregnancy weight gain. These included nulliparity, being overweight, planning excessive gain, eating in front of a screen, low self-efficacy regarding pregnancy weight gain, thinking family or friends believe pregnant women should eat twice as much as before pregnancy, being agreeable, and having emotion control difficulties. Training and testing data yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.80) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.68), respectively.

conclusionsIn this first validated prediction model in early pregnancy, we found that nine psychological, physical, and social factors moderately predicted excess pregnancy weight gain in the final model. This research highlights the importance of several predictors, including relatively easily modifiable ones such as appropriate weight gain plans and mindfulness during eating, and lays an important methodological foundation for other future prediction models.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainAdultEmotionsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalOverweightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32484813
PMCPMC7266315
OpenAlexW3029488714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.