Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32484449›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review.

Kathleen Yin, Joshua Jung, Enrico Coiera, Liliana Laranjo, Ann Blandford, Adeel Khoja, Wan-Tien Tai, Daniel Psillakis Phillips, Annie Y S Lau

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring Patient and Caregiver Work and Continuity of Care During Hospital-to-Home Transitions of Care in the Canadian Context.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Understanding the Role of Patients and Carers in a Virtual Hospital Through Journey Mapping: Multi-Method Triangulation Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Price Transparency and Patient Empowerment.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Ergonomics of an In-Patient Hospitalization.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. "SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathleen YinCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-9805
Joshua JungCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2210-1895
Enrico CoieraCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6444-6584
Liliana LaranjoCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-3402
Ann BlandfordUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3198-7122
Adeel KhojaDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1513-408X
Wan-Tien TaiCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8195-7602
Daniel Psillakis PhillipsCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-3526
Annie Y S LauCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3028-4222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaving patients self-manage their health conditions is a widely promoted concept, but many patients struggle to practice it effectively. Moreover, few studies have analyzed the nature of work required from patients and how such work fits into the context of their daily life.

objectiveThis study aimed to review the characteristics of patient work in adult patients. Patient work refers to tasks that health conditions impose on patients (eg, taking medications) within a system of contextual factors.

methodsA systematic scoping review was conducted using narrative synthesis. Data were extracted from PubMed, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO, including studies from August 2013 to August 2018. The included studies focused on adult patients and assessed one or more of the following: (1) physical health-related tasks, (2) cognitive health-related tasks, or (3) contextual factors affecting these tasks. Tasks were categorized according to the themes that emerged: (1) if the task is always visible to others or can be cognitive, (2) if the task must be conducted collaboratively or can be conducted alone, and (3) if the task was done with the purpose of creating resources. Contextual factors were grouped according to the level at which they exert influence (micro, meso, or macro) and where they fit in the patient work system (the macroergonomic layer of physical, social, and organizational factors; the mesoergonomic layer of household and community; and the microergonomic triad of person-task-tools).

resultsIn total, 67 publications were included, with 58 original research articles and 9 review articles. A variety of patient work tasks were observed, ranging from physical and tangible tasks (such as taking medications and visiting health care professionals) to psychological and social tasks (such as creating coping strategies). Patient work was affected by a range of contextual factors on the micro, meso, or macro levels. Our results indicate that most patient work was done alone, in private, and often imposing cognitive burden with low amounts of support.

conclusionsThis review sought to provide insight into the work burden of health management from a patient perspective and how patient context influences such work. For many patients, health-related work is ever present, invisible, and overwhelming. When researchers and clinicians design and implement patient-facing interventions, it is important to understand how the extra work impacts one's internal state and coping strategy, how such work fits into daily routines, and if these changes could be maintained in the long term.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMalePatientsSelf-ManagementWorkburden of illnessself-careself-management

Identifiers

PMID32484449
PMCPMC7298639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.