Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483831›Full record

ArticleGround water2021

Recommended Sampling Intervals for Arsenic in Private Wells.

Brian J Mailloux, Nicholas A Procopio, Mark Bakker, Therese Chen, Imtiaz Choudhury, Kazi Matin Ahmed, M Rajib H Mozumder, Tyler Ellis, Steve Chillrud, Alexander van Geen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ground water, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Brian J Mailloux
Nicholas A ProcopioNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science and Research, Trenton, NJ, 08064, USA.
Mark BakkerWater Management Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Therese ChenEnvironmental Science Department, Barnard College, NY, New York, 10027, USA.
Imtiaz ChoudhuryDepartment of Geology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kazi Matin AhmedDepartment of Geology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
M Rajib H MozumderLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, 10964, USA.
Tyler EllisLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, 10964, USA.
Steve ChillrudLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, 10964, USA.
Alexander van GeenLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, 10964, USA.
Columbia University · USLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory · USUniversity of Dhaka · BDBarnard College · USDelft University of Technology · NLNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES010349 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NAVAS-ACIEN, ANA · 2000 to 2020
$53.6M
True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geogenic arsenic in drinking water is a worldwide problem. For private well owners, testing (e.g., private or government laboratory) is the main method to determine arsenic concentration. However, the temporal variability of arsenic concentrations is not well characterized and it is not clear how often private wells should be tested. To answer this question, three datasets, two new and one publicly available, with temporal arsenic data were utilized: 6370 private wells from New Jersey tested at least twice since 2002, 2174 wells from the USGS NAWQA database, and 391 private wells sampled 14 years apart from Bangladesh. Two arsenic drinking water standards are used for the analysis: 10 µg/L, the WHO guideline and EPA standard or maximum contaminant level (MCL) and 5 µg/L, the New Jersey MCL. A rate of change was determined for each well and these rates were used to predict the temporal change in arsenic for a range of initial arsenic concentrations below an MCL. For each MCL and initial concentration, the probability of exceeding an MCL over time was predicted. Results show that to limit a person to below a 5% chance of drinking water above an MCL, wells that are ½ an MCL and above should be tested every year and wells below ½ an MCL should be tested every 5 years. These results indicate that one test result below an MCL is inadequate to ensure long-term compliance. Future recommendations should account for temporal variability when creating drinking water standards and guidance for private well owners.

Indexed as

ArsenicGroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalBangladeshEnvironmental MonitoringHumansNew JerseyWater SupplyWater WellsArsenicWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID32483831
PMCPMC8055375
OpenAlexW3029413270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.