Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483825›Full record

ArticleProteins2020

Performance of human and server prediction in CAPRI rounds 38-45.

Rui Duan, Liming Qiu, Xianjin Xu, Zhiwei Ma, Benjamin Ryan Merideth, Chi-Ren Shyu, Xiaoqin Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rui DuanDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Liming QiuDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Xianjin XuDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Zhiwei MaDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Benjamin Ryan MeridethDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Chi-Ren ShyuInstitute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Xiaoqin ZouDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-8648

Funding

MANIPULATING IKS AS A THERAPEUTIC APPROACH TO CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIASR01HL126774 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CUI, JIANMIN · 2015 to 2018
$3.1M
Structure prediction and in silico screening of protein-peptide interactionsR35GM136409 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI XIAOQIN ZOU · 2020 to 2026
$2.9M
Mechanism of BK Channel GatingR01HL142301 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SILVA, JONATHAN R · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
Database and software development for protein-nucleic acid structure predicationR01GM109980 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ZOU, XIAOQIN · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126774NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL126774NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142301NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL142301NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109980NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM109980NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAPRI challenges offer a variety of blind tests for protein-protein interaction prediction. In CAPRI Rounds 38-45, we generated a set of putative binding modes for each target with an FFT-based docking algorithm, and then scored and ranked these binding modes with a proprietary scoring function, ITScorePP. We have also developed a novel web server, Rebipp. The algorithm utilizes information retrieval to identify relevant biological information to significantly reduce the search space for a particular protein. In parallel, we have also constructed a GPU-based docking server, MDockPP, for protein-protein complex structure prediction. Here, the performance of our protocol in CAPRI rounds 38-45 is reported, which include 16 docking and scoring targets. Among them, three targets contain multiple interfaces: Targets 124, 125, and 136 have 2, 4, and 3 interfaces, respectively. In the predictor experiments, we predicted correct binding modes for nine targets, including one high-accuracy interface, six medium-accuracy binding modes, and six acceptable-accuracy binding modes. For the docking server prediction experiments, we predicted correct binding modes for eight targets, including one high-accuracy, three medium-accuracy, and five acceptable-accuracy binding modes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMolecular Docking SimulationSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesData MiningHumansLigandsOligosaccharidesPeptidesProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MappingProtein MultimerizationLigandsOligosaccharidesPeptidesProteinsinformation retrievalmolecular dockingprotein-peptide interactionsprotein-protein interactionsprotein-sugar interactionsscoring functiontext mining

Identifiers

PMID32483825
PMCPMC7423244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.