Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483729›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2020

Radiopharmaceuticals for Treatment of Osteosarcoma.

Peter M Anderson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Targeted alpha therapy with theFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M AndersonPediatric and Taussig Cancer Institutes, Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and BMT, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. andersp@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although trace amounts of radioactivity are routinely used to detect osteosarcoma, the use of larger therapeutic amounts of radiation is often an unrecognized opportunity to treat metastatic osteosarcoma. This chapter will review a number of approaches to use ionizing radiation in the form of injectable radiopharmaceuticals. Since bone metastases are a common pattern of metastatic spread of cancer in general, a number of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have been developed and FDA approved for treatment of bone metastases. Although osteosarcoma, a bone-forming cancer, would seem ideally suited to be treated with bone seekers, patterns of relapse involving non-ossifying metastases remain a major problem to be overcome. Thus, this review will not only describe experience using a number of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals such as 153-samarium-EDTMP, 153-samarium-DOTMP, and 223-radium against osteosarcoma, but also approaches to identify patients who may benefit as well as some means to the improve overall efficacy including combination therapy with routine agents and using nuclear imaging to develop best strategy for use. These include imaging with not only

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaRadiopharmaceuticalsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAntineoplastic AgentsRadiopharmaceuticalsAlpha emitterBeta emitterCryoablationDenosumabDoxorubicin liposomesGemcitabineIfosfamideLipid raft-seeking radiopharmaceuticalPazopanibRadiosensitizerRadiumSamariumSodium fluoride PETSPECT CTStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)StrontiumZolendronate

Identifiers

PMID32483729
OpenAlexW3031204007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.