ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021
Oncological outcome of videoscopic groin dissection for lymph node metastasis from melanoma.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulval cancer: feasibility, peri-operative outcomes and oncological safety.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A Review of the Literature on Videoscopic and Robotic Inguinal-Iliac-Obturator Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- One-Year Morbidity Following Videoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Stage III Melanoma.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VIL) represents an innovative approach for patients with melanoma lymph node (LN) metastases, mainly aimed at lowering wound-related morbidity. However, long-term data on oncologic safety are still lacking. The aim of this study is to review the oncologic outcome of videoscopic groin dissection in a single institution caseload.
methodsData were prospectively gathered on patients with inguinal melanoma metastasis who underwent VIL. Clinical data included age, race, sex, tumor histology, node counts and number of metastatic nodes. Disease-free survival and overall survival were monitored based on an institutional follow-up schedule. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Video-SIIO II study).
resultsWe analyzed 48 videoscopic groin dissections performed in 50 patients (2 patients underwent bilateral VIL). Median age was 54.5 years. Female/male ratio was 15/33. Indication for surgery was positive inguinal sentinel biopsy and cytological confirmed clinical disease in 40 and 10 cases, respectively. Median LN retrieval count was 19. After a median follow-up of 28 months, groin recurrence (lymphatic basin) was observed in one single case.
conclusionsVIL for melanoma LN metastases is associated with a favorable oncologic outcome. In particular, LN yield and locoregional recurrence rate obtained with videoscopic dissection are comparable to those reported with the open technique. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results in a larger cohort of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.