ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2020
Why Pregnancy Weight Gain Guidelines Need to Differ for Multiple Versus Single Pregnancies.
Review in Current nutrition reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct pregnancy challenges in PCOS women undergoing IVF/ICSI with singleton and twin births: a propensity-matched analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- What is known about gestational weight gain in Chinese twin pregnancies? A scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Exploring basal metabolic rate and dietary adequacy in twin pregnancies: the VENERE study.Nutrition & metabolism · 2024Article
- Review of Dietary Recommendations for Twin Pregnancy: Does Nutrition Science Keep Up with the Growing Incidence of Multiple Gestations?Nutrients · 2022Review
- Clinical Observation of Effects of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Weight Gain during Pregnancy on Neonatal Weight and Delivery Outcome.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThe purpose of this review was to compare physiological and metabolic changes in singleton and twin gestations and to review pregnancy outcomes with respect to current weight gain guidelines. RECENT
findingsReviews in singleton gestations show that weight gain below the recommended guidelines has been associated with small for gestational age infants (less than the 10th percentile) which place these infants at increased risk for neonatal morbidities. Observational studies have shown that adequate and excessive gestational weight gain in twin gestations has been associated with longer gestations and less preterm birth along with increased birth weight at delivery. Weight gain in pregnancy has been identified as a factor that affects both maternal and infant health outcomes in singleton and twin gestations. There is a larger body of research examining these effects in singleton gestations than twin gestations; however, in both groups, the data remain mostly observational and retrospective. Thus far, the research supports the Institute of Medicine recommended weight gain guidelines in singleton and twin gestations for women with normal BMI, but future research should be directed toward underweight and overweight women and the long-term outcomes in all mothers and their offspring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.