Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483685›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Evaluation of ultra-rapid susceptibility testing of ceftolozane-tazobactam by a flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.

Inês Martins-Oliveira, Blanca Pérez-Viso, Sofia Quintas, Ana Silva-Dias, Rosário Gomes, Acácio G Rodrigues, Rafael Cantón, Cidalia Pina-Vaz

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Inês Martins-OliveiraFASTinov, S.A., Matosinhos, Portugal.
Blanca Pérez-VisoServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Sofia QuintasDivision of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Silva-DiasFASTinov, S.A., Matosinhos, Portugal.
Rosário GomesFASTinov, S.A., Matosinhos, Portugal.
Acácio G RodriguesFASTinov, S.A., Matosinhos, Portugal.
Rafael CantónServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Cidalia Pina-VazFASTinov, S.A., Matosinhos, Portugal. cpinavaz@fastinov.com.
Universidade do Porto · PTCentre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ES

Funding

H2020 Health 730713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urgent need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility is broadly apparent from government reports to the lay press. Accordingly, we developed a flow-cytometry assay (FCM) for evaluating ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) susceptibility directly on blood cultures (BC) requiring < 2 h from flag positivity to report. The protocol was optimized with C/T-susceptible and C/T-resistant gram-negative bacilli inoculated in BC aerobic bottles (Becton-Dickinson, USA), and afterward optimized for different C/T concentrations (1/4, 2/4, 4/4, and 8/4 mg/L) for 1 h incubation (37 °C), followed by FCM and software analysis. Fluorescent membrane permeability and membrane potential dyes were comparatively used to detect early cell lesions using the CytoFLEX cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, USA). Repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of the assay up to 48 h after BC positivity were determined. Internal validation was performed in spiked BC bottles with 130 Enterobacterales and 32 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Porto University (Portugal), including 13 ATCC isolates. Additionally, 64 gram-negative bacilli recovered from positive BC at Ramon y Cajal Hospital (Madrid, Spain) were tested. Categorical agreement (CA) and analytical errors were calculated comparing FCM with broth microdilution results. Only the membrane potential dyes clearly distinguished CT-susceptible and CT-resistant isolates. Excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and inter-method concordance was observed. Overall, CA was 99.1% using EUCAST criteria with 2 major errors and 98.7% with CLSI criteria with 2 major and 1 minor errors. A new, accurate, and ultra-rapid FCM (< 2 h) for testing C/T susceptibility gave accurate results and would expand current FCM antimicrobial susceptibility assay.

Indexed as

Microbial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CultureCephalosporinsFlow CytometryGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive BacteriaGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansPortugalSpainTazobactamAnti-Bacterial Agentsceftolozane, tazobactam drug combinationCephalosporinsTazobactamAnti-microbial resistanceAntimicrobial susceptibility testingBlood cultureCeftolozane-tazobactamFlow cytometryMicrobiology diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID32483685
OpenAlexW3032215810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.