ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020
Evaluation of ultra-rapid susceptibility testing of ceftolozane-tazobactam by a flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of antimicrobial resistance via state-of-the-art technologies versus conventional methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Performance of Flow Cytometry-Based Rapid Assay in Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm applied in computed tomography images of patients with intracranial hemorrhage.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Current and Future Flow Cytometry Applications Contributing to Antimicrobial Resistance Control.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Antibacterial and anatomical defenses in an oil contaminated, vulnerable seaduck.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The urgent need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility is broadly apparent from government reports to the lay press. Accordingly, we developed a flow-cytometry assay (FCM) for evaluating ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) susceptibility directly on blood cultures (BC) requiring < 2 h from flag positivity to report. The protocol was optimized with C/T-susceptible and C/T-resistant gram-negative bacilli inoculated in BC aerobic bottles (Becton-Dickinson, USA), and afterward optimized for different C/T concentrations (1/4, 2/4, 4/4, and 8/4 mg/L) for 1 h incubation (37 °C), followed by FCM and software analysis. Fluorescent membrane permeability and membrane potential dyes were comparatively used to detect early cell lesions using the CytoFLEX cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, USA). Repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of the assay up to 48 h after BC positivity were determined. Internal validation was performed in spiked BC bottles with 130 Enterobacterales and 32 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Porto University (Portugal), including 13 ATCC isolates. Additionally, 64 gram-negative bacilli recovered from positive BC at Ramon y Cajal Hospital (Madrid, Spain) were tested. Categorical agreement (CA) and analytical errors were calculated comparing FCM with broth microdilution results. Only the membrane potential dyes clearly distinguished CT-susceptible and CT-resistant isolates. Excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and inter-method concordance was observed. Overall, CA was 99.1% using EUCAST criteria with 2 major errors and 98.7% with CLSI criteria with 2 major and 1 minor errors. A new, accurate, and ultra-rapid FCM (< 2 h) for testing C/T susceptibility gave accurate results and would expand current FCM antimicrobial susceptibility assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.