ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020
Potential issues of well water in domestic use in a retrospective study from 2014 to 2018.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well water requires chemical, physical-chemical, and microbiological analysis to ensure that the water used for irrigation or for human consumption presents no specific risks. The aim of the present work was to determine the microbiological risk of samples taken from wells in south-central Sardinia. In this survey, 55 water samples were taken from private wells in the period from 2014 to 2018. Quality was assessed through the detection of the parameters required by national law. The analysis of the data showed that only 36.4% of the samples (20 wells) complied with legal limits for water for human consumption. The most isolated species was P. aeruginosa, present in 29.1%; its high concentration and recorded Coliforms suggest that the disinfection of the wells was insufficient or not performed properly if implemented. Such data suggest the need to pay more attention to the waters used not only for human consumption but also for irrigation, since the cultivated vegetables could become a vehicle for potentially pathogenic microorganisms. National legislation sets contamination limits only for water intended for human consumption and not for irrigation water. However, based on these considerations, it appears necessary to develop reference standards for irrigation water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.