ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2020
Top 50 cited articles on dental stem cell research.
Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric and science-mapping analysis of translation-oriented signals across six dental stem-cell subtypes: a Web of Science study (2000-2025).Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Establishment of Dental Pulp Cell Culture System for Analyzing Dentinogenesis in Mouse Incisors.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Top cited articles in Oral Radiology: A bibliometric network analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- The 100 top-cited articles in uveitis from 1950 to 2022.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Contemporary research trends on nanoparticles in endodontics: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2023Article
- Scientific trends on research on denture stomatitis based on Scopus database: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Article
- Current Scientific Research Trends on Salivary Biomarkers: A Bibliometric Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCitation analysis provides a unique insight into how scientific interests and research trends have changed over time. The aim of this study was to report on the 50 top-cited papers in dental stem cell research using the Science Citation Index Expanded provided by the Web of Science database to determine the academic importance of each contribution. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter the screening, article title and type, total citations and citations per year, publication journal, publication year, first and senior authors, country of origin, institution, and university of reprint author were documented for the 50 top-cited articles in dental stem cell research. Keyword analysis was performed to determine which keywords were most/least popular.
resultsTop 50-cited articles were cited between 179 to 2,275 times. The majority of papers were published in 2008 and originated from the United States with the highest contribution from the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research.
conclusionsBasic science studies in dental stem cell research published in high impact factor journals had the highest citation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.