ArticleNature energy2020
Improved asthma outcomes observed in the vicinity of coal power plant retirement, retrofit, and conversion to natural gas.
Article in Nature energy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Emission reduction strategies and health: a systematic review on the tools and methods to assess co-benefits.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- The local impacts of coal and oil power plant retirements on air pollution and cardiorespiratory health in California: An application of generalized synthetic control method.Environmental research · 2023Pooled it
- Exposure to coal-fired power plant emissions, unconventional natural gas development, and salivary miRNA profiles and asthma in children.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the economic and social impact of coal mine phaseout in China.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Emissions Reductions at Coal Power Plants Continue to Offer Routes to Meet New US PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2026Article
- The green spark of partial reform: Evidence from China's electricity market experiment.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Wastewater-based surveillance for community exposome surveillance, Louisville, Kentucky.Discover water · 2026Article
- An environmental vulnerability index framework supporting targeted public health interventions at the census tracts level.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- High populations near fossil fuel energy infrastructure across the supply chain and implications for an equitable energy transition.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2025Article
- CAUSAL HEALTH IMPACTS OF POWER PLANT EMISSION CONTROLS UNDER MODELED AND UNCERTAIN PHYSICAL PROCESS INTERFERENCE.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Cancer Incidence Among Residents Near Coal-Fired Power Plants Based on the Korean National Health Insurance System Data.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Fine-Scale Neighborhood Air Pollution Mapping: A First Step Toward Decoding Racial Asthma Disparities.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Steady-state analysis of social responsibility strategy of coal power enterprises from the perspective of game theory.Heliyon · 2024Article
- ER24/1 !: The greatest emergency of our time.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- A Long Way from Steubenville: Environmental Epidemiology in a Rapidly Changing World.American journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- To promote healthy aging, focus on the environment.Nature aging · 2023Review
- Forecasting coal power plant retirement ages and lock-in with random forest regression.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Asthma, COPD, Respiratory, and Allergic Health Effects in an Adult Population Living near an Italian Refinery: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Sulfur dioxide reduction at coal-fired power plants in North Carolina and associations with preterm birth among surrounding residents.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coal-fired power plants release substantial air pollution, including over 60% of U.S. sulfur dioxide (SO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.