Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483489›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2020

Neuromuscular blockade management in the critically Ill patient.

J Ross Renew, Robert Ratzlaff, Vivian Hernandez-Torres, Sorin J Brull, Richard C Prielipp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Use of Cisatracurium in Cardiac Surgery.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sugammadex and Acceleromyography Used During a Lensectomy in a Sea Lion (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Physiological pattern differences in non-intubatedJournal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Ross Renew1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9389-6413
Robert Ratzlaff2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL USA.
Vivian Hernandez-Torres1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA.
Sorin J Brull1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA.
Richard C Prielipp3Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Jacksonville College · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) can be an effective modality to address challenges that arise daily in the intensive care unit (ICU). These medications are often used to optimize mechanical ventilation, facilitate endotracheal intubation, stop overt shivering during therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest, and may have a role in the management of life-threatening conditions such as elevated intracranial pressure and status asthmaticus (when deep sedation fails or is not tolerated). However, current NMBA use has decreased during the last decade due to concerns of potential adverse effects such as venous thrombosis, patient awareness during paralysis, development of critical illness myopathy, autonomic interactions, and even residual paralysis following cessation of NMBA use. It is therefore essential for clinicians to be familiar with evidence-based practices regarding appropriate NMBA use in order to select appropriate indications for their use and avoid complications. We believe that selecting the right NMBA, administering concomitant sedation and analgesic therapy, and using appropriate monitoring techniques mitigate these risks for critically ill patients. Therefore, we review the indications of NMBA use in the critical care setting and discuss the most appropriate use of NMBAs in the intensive care setting based on their structure, mechanism of action, side effects, and recognized clinical indications. Lastly, we highlight the available pharmacologic antagonists, strategies for sedation, newer neuromuscular monitoring techniques, and potential complications related to the use of NMBAs in the ICU setting.

Indexed as

Critical careIntensive care unitNeuromuscular blockadeNeuromuscular blocking agentsNeuromuscular monitoringPharmacologic antagonism

Identifiers

PMID32483489
PMCPMC7245849
OpenAlexW3028728540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.