ArticleThe West Virginia medical journal2018
Residents' Views on Research and Quality Improvement Training Can Guide Practice-Based Research Network Collaboration.
Article in The West Virginia medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Education in Internal Medicine Residency Training Program: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study was conducted by the West Virginia Practice-Based Research Network Learning Collaborative to assess research activity, confidence, and attitudes toward residency programs' research and quality improvement requirements and inform the integration of the state-wide practice-based research network (PBRN) as mentors to support practice transformation implementation initiatives across various resident training sites in West Virginia.
methodsThis pilot study assessed residents' attitudes regarding (1) research activity, (2) confidence and (3) requirements of their program in research and quality improvement training by using an anonymous survey, administered during regular residency meetings.
resultsOf the 68 residents,representing four DO and MD Family Medicine residency programs in West Virginia, 40 (58.8%) responded to the survey. About 64 percent of residents had worked on a quality improvement project, and more than half of residents (52.5%) submitted a research project for a competitive presentation within the most recent year. Sixty-five percent felt satisfied with the residency program's research and quality improvement curriculum. However, only 55 percent felt confident to perform a project and 52 percent submitted a project to a competitive forum.
conclusionOnly half of the residents demonstrate activity and confidence in research and quality improvement. This shows an opportunity to assess current curriculums and provide new strategies to enhance their ability to conduct practice transformation initiatives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.