Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Pringle Maneuver in Extended Liver Resection: A propensity score analysis.

Mohammed Al-Saeedi, Omid Ghamarnejad, Elias Khajeh, Saeed Shafiei, Roozbeh Salehpour, Mohammad Golriz, Markus Mieth, Karl Heinz Weiss, Thomas Longerich, Katrin Hoffmann and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Network pharmacology prediction to discover the potential pharmacological action mechanism of Rhizoma Dioscoreae for liver regeneration.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Malignancies in Patients with Low-MELD Cirrhosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammed Al-SaeediDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Omid GhamarnejadDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elias KhajehDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Saeed ShafieiDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roozbeh SalehpourDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mohammad GolrizDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus MiethDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-9436
Karl Heinz WeissLiver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas LongerichInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arianeb MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Arianeb.Mehrabi@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ongoing decades-long controversy, Pringle maneuver (PM) is still frequently used by hepatobiliary surgeons during hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of PM on intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, and posthepatectomy hemorrhage (PHH). A series of 209 consecutive patients underwent extended hepatectomy (EH) (≥5 segment resection). The association of PM with perioperative outcomes was evaluated using multivariate analysis with a propensity score method to control for confounding. Fifty patients underwent PM with a median duration of 19 minutes. Multivariate analysis revealed that risk of excessive intraoperative bleeding (≥1500 ml; odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.70, p = 0.007), major morbidity (OR 0.41, 95%-CI 0.18-0.97, p = 0.041), and PHH (OR 0.22, 95%-CI 0.06-0.79, p = 0.021) were significantly lower in PM group after EH. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in 3-year recurrence-free-survival between groups. PM is associated with lower intraoperative bleeding, PHH, and major morbidity risk after EH. Performing PM does not increase posthepatectomy liver failure and does not affect recurrence rate. Therefore, PM seems to be justified in EH.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHemorrhageHepatectomyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver Function TestsLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPostoperative PeriodPropensity ScoreTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32483357
PMCPMC7264345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.