Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483346›Full record

ReviewNature communications2020

Four-dimensional metal-organic frameworks.

Jack D Evans, Volodymyr Bon, Irena Senkovska, Hui-Chun Lee, Stefan Kaskel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamic covalent organic frameworks.Chemical science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Adsorption and Separation by Flexible MOFs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Atomic observation and structural evolution of covalent organic framework rotamers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jack D EvansTechnische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-2601
Volodymyr BonTechnische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-5031
Irena SenkovskaTechnische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Hui-Chun LeeTechnische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan KaskelTechnische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062, Dresden, Germany. stefan.kaskel@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4572-0303

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) FOR2433EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 742743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognising timescale as an adjustable dimension in porous solids provides a new perspective to develop novel four-dimensional framework materials. The deliberate design of three-dimensional porous framework architectures is a developed field; however, the understanding of dynamics in open frameworks leaves a number of key questions unanswered: What factors determine the spatiotemporal evolution of deformable networks? Can we deliberately engineer the response of dynamic materials along a time-axis? How can we engineer energy barriers for the selective recognition of molecules? Answering these questions will require significant methodological development to understand structural dynamics across a range of time and length scales.

Identifiers

PMID32483346
PMCPMC7264271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.