Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32483332›Full record

ArticleNature methods2020

Targeted Perturb-seq enables genome-scale genetic screens in single cells.

Daniel Schraivogel, Andreas R Gschwind, Jennifer H Milbank, Daniel R Leonce, Petra Jakob, Lukas Mathur, Jan O Korbel, Christoph A Merten, Lars Velten, Lars M Steinmetz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Enhancer hubs govern chromatin topology and Th17 cell identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel Schraivogel *European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5734-6980
Andreas R Gschwind *Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-6907
Jennifer H MilbankEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel R LeonceEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Petra JakobEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lukas MathurEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan O KorbelEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2798-3794
Christoph A MertenEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars VeltenEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany. lars.velten@crg.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1233-5874
Lars M SteinmetzEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany. larsms@embl.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3962-2865
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DECentre for Genomic Regulation · ESEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBStanford University · US

Funding

European Research Council 294542European Research Council 742804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcriptome contains rich information on molecular, cellular and organismal phenotypes. However, experimental and statistical limitations constrain sensitivity and throughput of genetic screening with single-cell transcriptomics readout. To overcome these limitations, we introduce targeted Perturb-seq (TAP-seq), a sensitive, inexpensive and platform-independent method focusing single-cell RNA-seq coverage on genes of interest, thereby increasing the sensitivity and scale of genetic screens by orders of magnitude. TAP-seq permits routine analysis of thousands of CRISPR-mediated perturbations within a single experiment, detects weak effects and lowly expressed genes, and decreases sequencing requirements by up to 50-fold. We apply TAP-seq to generate perturbation-based enhancer-target gene maps for 1,778 enhancers within 2.5% of the human genome. We thereby show that enhancer-target association is jointly determined by three-dimensional contact frequency and epigenetic states, allowing accurate prediction of enhancer targets throughout the genome. In addition, we demonstrate that TAP-seq can identify cell subtypes with only 100 sequencing reads per cell.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsHumansRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32483332
PMCPMC7610614
OpenAlexW3029730770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.