ArticleScientific reports2020
Feasibility of the Energy Expenditure Prediction for Athletes and Non-Athletes from Ankle-Mounted Accelerometer and Heart Rate Monitor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy Expenditure Estimation of Tabata by Combining Acceleration and Heart Rate.Frontiers in public health · 2021Trial
- Feasibility of energy expenditure estimation during outdoor walking using multimodal in-ear sensors: a preliminary validation study against indirect calorimetry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Differences in Total Daily Energy Expenditure Across Field Sports: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the nature of micro-electromechanical systems, the vector magnitude (VM) activity of accelerometers varies depending on the wearing position and does not identify different levels of physical fitness. Without an appropriate energy expenditure (EE) estimation equation, bias can occur in the estimated values. We aimed to amend the EE estimation equation using heart rate reserve (HRR) parameters as the correction factor, which could be applied to athletes and non-athletes who primarily use ankle-mounted devices. Indirect calorimetry was used as the criterion measure with an accelerometer (ankle-mounted) equipped with a heart rate monitor to synchronously measure the EE of 120 healthy adults on a treadmill in four groups. Compared with ankle-mounted accelerometer outputs, when the traditional equation was modified using linear regression by combining VM with body weight and/or HRR parameters (modified models: Model A, without HRR; Model B, with HRR), both Model A (r: 0.931 to 0.972; ICC: 0.913 to 0.954) and Model B (r: 0.933 to 0.975; ICC: 0.930 to 0.959) showed the valid and reliable predictive ability for the four groups. With respect to the simplest and most reasonable mode, Model A seems to be a good choice for predicting EE when using an ankle-mounted device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.