Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32482865›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Airborne bacteria confirm the pristine nature of the Southern Ocean boundary layer.

Jun Uetake, Thomas C J Hill, Kathryn A Moore, Paul J DeMott, Alain Protat, Sonia M Kreidenweis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbial ecology of the atmosphere.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ocean Aerobiology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun UetakeDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.ORCID 0000-0001-8135-2531
Thomas C J HillDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.ORCID 0000-0002-5293-3959
Kathryn A MooreDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-5422
Paul J DeMottDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.ORCID 0000-0002-3719-1889
Alain ProtatResearch and Development, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, VIC 3008, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8933-874X
Sonia M KreidenweisResearch and Development, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, VIC 3008, Australia sonia@atmos.colostate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-2914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms are ubiquitous and highly diverse in the atmosphere. Despite the potential impacts of airborne bacteria found in the lower atmosphere over the Southern Ocean (SO) on the ecology of Antarctica and on marine cloud phase, no previous region-wide assessment of bioaerosols over the SO has been reported. We conducted bacterial profiling of boundary layer shipboard aerosol samples obtained during an Austral summer research voyage, spanning 42.8 to 66.5°S. Contrary to findings over global subtropical regions and the Northern Hemisphere, where transport of microorganisms from continents often controls airborne communities, the great majority of the bacteria detected in our samples were marine, based on taxonomy, back trajectories, and source tracking analysis. Further, the beta diversity of airborne bacterial communities varied with latitude and temperature, but not with other meteorological variables. Limited meridional airborne transport restricts southward community dispersal, isolating Antarctica and inhibiting microorganism and nutrient deposition from lower latitudes to these same regions. A consequence and implication for this region's marine boundary layer and the clouds that overtop it is that it is truly pristine, free from continental and anthropogenic influences, with the ocean as the dominant source controlling low-level concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei and ice nucleating particles.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyOceans and SeasAerosolsAntarctic RegionsBacteriaGeographyMicrobiotaSeawaterTemperatureAerosolsbioaerosolmarine aerosolSouthern Ocean

Identifiers

PMID32482865
PMCPMC7306778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.