ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Spiking activity in the human hippocampus prior to encoding predicts subsequent memory.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic mapping of network-level LTP in the hippocampus via high-resolution bioelectrical sensing.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Concept and location neurons in the human brain provide the 'what' and 'where' in memory formation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Engram mechanisms of memory linking and identity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Assessing translational applicability of perineuronal net dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease across species.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Neural and cognitive dynamics leading to the formation of strong memories: A meta-analysis and the SAM model.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Direct brain recordings suggest a causal subsequent-memory effect.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Article
- Brain volumetric changes in menopausal women and its association with cognitive function: a structured review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Review
- Hippocampal convergence during anticipatory midbrain activation promotes subsequent memory formation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022Review
- Two kinds of memory signals in neurons of the human hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Intracranial electrophysiological recordings from the human brain during memory tasks with pupillometry.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Generalized Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (G-SLAM) as unification framework for natural and artificial intelligences: towards reverse engineering the hippocampal/entorhinal system and principles of high-level cognition.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural measures of subsequent memory reflect endogenous variability in cognitive function.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Encoding activity in the medial temporal lobe, presumably evoked by the presentation of stimuli (postonset activity), is known to predict subsequent memory. However, several independent lines of research suggest that preonset activity also affects subsequent memory. We investigated the role of preonset and postonset single-unit and multiunit activity recorded from epilepsy patients as they completed a continuous recognition task. In this task, words were presented in a continuous series and eventually began to repeat. For each word, the patient's task was to decide whether it was novel or repeated. We found that preonset spiking activity in the hippocampus (when the word was novel) predicted subsequent memory (when the word was later repeated). Postonset activity during encoding also predicted subsequent memory, but was simply a continuation of preonset activity. The predictive effect of preonset spiking activity was much stronger in the hippocampus than in three other brain regions (amygdala, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortex). In addition, preonset and postonset activity around the encoding of novel words did not predict memory performance for novel words (i.e., correctly classifying the word as novel), and preonset and postonset activity around the time of retrieval did not predict memory performance for repeated words (i.e., correctly classifying the word as repeated). Thus, the only predictive effect was between preonset activity (along with its postonset continuation) at the time of encoding and subsequent memory. Taken together, these findings indicate that preonset hippocampal activity does not reflect general arousal/attention but instead reflects what we term "attention to encoding."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.