Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32482792›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2020

Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Ahmad Masri, Syed Bukhari, Yvonne S Eisele, Prem Soman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preclinical and preliminary clinical evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Current cardiology reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cardiac amyloidosis: state-of-the-art review.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad MasriDivision of Cardiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; and.
Syed BukhariDivision of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yvonne S EiseleDivision of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Prem SomanDivision of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania premsoman@usa.net.
University of Pittsburgh · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Advancing Our Understanding of Oligomer Toxicity in Age-Related Amyloid DisordersR00AG050764 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI EISELE, YVONNE SIMONE · 2019 to 2021
$747k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG050764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transthyretin and light-chain amyloidosis are the 2 main causes of cardiac amyloidosis. Recent developments in molecular imaging have transformed our ability to diagnose transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis noninvasively and unmasked a hitherto unrecognized prevalence of the disease. This review summarizes the current and evolving imaging approaches, their molecular structural basis, and the gaps in imaging capabilities that have arisen as a result of parallel developments in pharmacotherapy delivering the first effective treatment options for this condition.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisCardiomyopathiesHumansMolecular ImagingATTRbone-seeking tracerscardiac amyloidosismolecular imagingSPECT

Identifiers

PMID32482792
PMCPMC9374028
OpenAlexW3032130358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.