Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32482645›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2020

Tapering towards DMARD-free remission in established rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results of the TARA trial.

Elise van Mulligen, Angelique E Weel, J M Hazes, Annette van der Helm-van Mil, Pascal Hendrik Pieter de Jong

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current and future treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeting Therapeutic Windows for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise van MulligenRheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands elise.vanmulligen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1900-790X
Angelique E WeelRheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
J M HazesRheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Annette van der Helm-van MilRheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-1437
Pascal Hendrik Pieter de JongRheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the 2-year clinical effectiveness of two gradual tapering strategies. The first strategy consisted of tapering the conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) first (i.e., methotrexate in ~90%), followed by the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF-inhibitor), the second strategy consisted of tapering the TNF-inhibitor first, followed by the csDMARD.

methodsThis multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled trial included patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with well-controlled disease for ≥3 consecutive months, defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) measured in 44 joints ≤2.4 and a swollen joint count ≤1, which was achieved with a csDMARD and a TNF-inhibitor. Eligible patients were randomised into gradual tapering the csDMARD followed by the TNF-inhibitor, or vice versa. The primary outcome was the number of disease flares. Secondary outcomes were DMARD-free remission (DFR), DAS, functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)) and radiographic progression.

results189 patients were randomly assigned to tapering their csDMARD (n=94) or TNF-inhibitor (n=95) first. The cumulative flare rate after 24 months was, respectively, 61% (95% CI 50% to 71%) and 62% (95% CI 52% to 72%). The patients who tapered their csDMARD first were more often able to go through the entire tapering protocol and reached DFR more often than the group that tapered the TNF-inhibitor first (32% vs 20% (p=0.12) and 21% vs 10% (p=0.07), respectively). Mean DAS and HAQ-DI over time, and radiographic progression did not differ between groups (p=0.45, p=0.17, p=0.8, respectively).

conclusionThe order of tapering did not affect flare rates, DAS or HAQ-DI. DFR was achievable in 15% of patients with established RA, slightly more frequent in patients that first tapered csDMARDs. Because of similar effects from a clinical viewpoint, financial arguments may influence the decision to taper TNF-inhibitors first.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSingle-Blind MethodSymptom Flare UpTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexateTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsarthritishealth caremethotrexateoutcome assessmentrheumatoidtumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32482645
PMCPMC7456559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.