Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32482627›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Perceptions, experiences, and understandings of cluster headache among GPs and neurologists: a qualitative study.

Alina Buture, Fayyaz Ahmed, Yachna Mehta, Koen Paemeleire, Peter J Goadsby, Lisa Dikomitis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Problem of headache: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alina ButureHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK; neurology registrar, Neurology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Fayyaz AhmedHull University Teaching Hospital, Hull, UK.
Yachna MehtaRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
Koen PaemeleireGhent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter J GoadsbyKing's College Hospital; professor of neurology, King's College London, London, UK.
Lisa DikomitisSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Ghent University Hospital · BEHull York Medical School · GBKeele University · GBKing's College Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCluster headache is a severe primary headache with a similar prevalence to that of multiple sclerosis. Cluster headache is characterised by unilateral trigeminal distribution of pain, ipsilateral cranial autonomic features, and a tendency to circadian and circannual periodicity.

aimTo explore the perceptions, experiences, and understandings of cluster headache among GPs and neurologists. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative interview study in primary care surgeries and neurology departments in the north of England.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs and neurologists, recorded, and transcribed. A thematic analysis was applied to the dataset.

resultsSixteen clinicians participated in this study: eight GPs and eight neurologists. Four main themes were identified following thematic analysis: challenges with the cluster headache diagnosis; impact of cluster headache; challenges with treatment; and appropriateness of referrals to secondary care. Clinicians recognised the delays in the diagnosis of cluster headache, misdiagnosis, and mismanagement, and were aware of the potential impact cluster headache can have on patients' mental health and ability to remain in employment. Findings highlighted tensions between primary and secondary care around the cost of medication and the remit of prescribing treatment regimens. Patients' anxiety, their need for reassurance, and their insistence about seeing a specialist are some of the reasons for referrals.

conclusionClinicians acknowledged delays in diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and mismanagement of cluster headache. The responsibility of prescribing causes ongoing tensions between primary and secondary care. Clear referral and management pathways for primary headaches are required to improve patient outcomes and healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Cluster HeadacheEnglandHumansNeurologistsPerceptionQualitative Researchdiagnostic delaydoctor-to-doctor communicationgeneral practiceprescribingsecondary care

Identifiers

PMID32482627
PMCPMC7274540
OpenAlexW3000266532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.