Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32482172›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Adverse events in deceased hospitalised cancer patients as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care.

Ellinor Christin Haukland, Christian von Plessen, Carsten Nieder, Barthold Vonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer care at the end of life: system-wide expenditure in a national health service.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. [Impact of palliative care on medication use and medical utilization in patients with advanced cancer].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Duration of palliative care involvement and immunotherapy treatment near the end of life among patients with cancer who died in-hospital.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellinor Christin HauklandDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, PO Box 1480, 8092, Bodø, Norway. ellinor.haukland@nlsh.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-2218
Christian von PlessenDirection Générale de la Santé, Canton Vaud, Switzerland.
Carsten NiederDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, PO Box 1480, 8092, Bodø, Norway.
Barthold VonenInstitute of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, PO Box 6, 9038, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

Helse Nord RHF PhD grant. HST1195-14Universitetet i Tromsø Funding of publication costs
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnticancer treatment exposes patients to negative consequences such as increased toxicity and decreased quality of life, and there are clear guidelines recommending limiting use of aggressive anticancer treatments for patients near end of life. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life and adverse events contributing to death and elucidate how adverse events can be used as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care.

methodsRetrospective cohort study of 247 deceased hospitalised cancer patients at three hospitals in Norway in 2012 and 2013. The Global Trigger Tool method were used to identify adverse events. We used Poisson regression and binary logistic regression to compare adverse events and association with use of anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life.

results30% of deceased hospitalised cancer patients received some kind of anticancer treatment during the last 30 days of life, mainly systemic anticancer treatment. These patients had 62% more adverse events compared to patients not being treated last 30 days, 39 vs. 24 adverse events per 1000 patient days (p < 0.001, OR 1.62 (1.23-2.15). They also had twice the odds of an adverse event contributing to death compared to patients without such treatment, 33 vs. 18% (p = 0.045, OR 1.85 (1.01-3.36)). Receiving follow up by specialist palliative care reduced the rate of AEs per 1000 patient days in both groups by 29% (p = 0.02, IRR 0.71, CI 95% 0.53-0.96).

conclusionsAnticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life is associated with a significantly increased rate of adverse events and related mortality. Patients receiving specialist palliative care had significantly fewer adverse events, supporting recommendations of early integration of palliative care in a patient safety perspective.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNorwayPatient SafetyQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesTerminal CareAdverse eventEnd of lifeGlobal trigger toolPalliative carePatient safety

Identifiers

PMID32482172
PMCPMC7265218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.