ArticleBMC palliative care2020
Adverse events in deceased hospitalised cancer patients as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer care at the end of life: system-wide expenditure in a national health service.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- [Impact of palliative care on medication use and medical utilization in patients with advanced cancer].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
- Systemic anticancer therapy during end of life in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. A retrospective single center study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Observational
- Invisible harm in patient safety: a framework and definition for preventable psychological harm in cancer care.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Evaluation of 30-day mortality rate following intravenous systemic anticancer therapy: a retrospective analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The Economic Cost of Nursing Care of Palliative Patients in the Emergency Department.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence of aggressive care among patients with cancer near the end of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- How Safe Do Dying People Feel at Home? Patients' Perception of Safety While Receiving Specialist Community Palliative Care.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2023Article
- Days at home in the last three months of life: patterns-of-care analysis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2023Article
- Palliative oncology and palliative care.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Duration of palliative care involvement and immunotherapy treatment near the end of life among patients with cancer who died in-hospital.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnticancer treatment exposes patients to negative consequences such as increased toxicity and decreased quality of life, and there are clear guidelines recommending limiting use of aggressive anticancer treatments for patients near end of life. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life and adverse events contributing to death and elucidate how adverse events can be used as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of 247 deceased hospitalised cancer patients at three hospitals in Norway in 2012 and 2013. The Global Trigger Tool method were used to identify adverse events. We used Poisson regression and binary logistic regression to compare adverse events and association with use of anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life.
results30% of deceased hospitalised cancer patients received some kind of anticancer treatment during the last 30 days of life, mainly systemic anticancer treatment. These patients had 62% more adverse events compared to patients not being treated last 30 days, 39 vs. 24 adverse events per 1000 patient days (p < 0.001, OR 1.62 (1.23-2.15). They also had twice the odds of an adverse event contributing to death compared to patients without such treatment, 33 vs. 18% (p = 0.045, OR 1.85 (1.01-3.36)). Receiving follow up by specialist palliative care reduced the rate of AEs per 1000 patient days in both groups by 29% (p = 0.02, IRR 0.71, CI 95% 0.53-0.96).
conclusionsAnticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life is associated with a significantly increased rate of adverse events and related mortality. Patients receiving specialist palliative care had significantly fewer adverse events, supporting recommendations of early integration of palliative care in a patient safety perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.