Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32482171›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2020

Integrated care pathways for Black persons with traumatic brain injury: a protocol for a critical transdisciplinary scoping review.

Samira Omar, LLana James, Angela Colantonio, Stephanie A Nixon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samira OmarRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. samira.omar@mail.utoronto.ca.
LLana JamesRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Angela ColantonioDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Stephanie A NixonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent understandings of the etiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the trajectory of care significantly lack consideration for the inclusion of Black populations. The global prevalence of TBI is increasing, particularly in North America and Europe where approximately 65 million people are affected every year. Although community integration is an ultimate goal of rehabilitation post injury, persons with TBI, particularly Black populations continually face challenges with regards to unmet needs along the continuum of care including meaningful participation and vocation, resulting in occupational deprivation. While integrated care is seen as an appealing approach to service delivery, little is known about what this means for Black people with TBI. This protocol produces the first critical transdisciplinary (CTD) scoping review mapping the extent, range, and nature of integrated care pathways for Black people experiencing TBI.

methodsCTD provides an analytical tool with a health equity lens that will be applied as both a methodology and theory for undertaking this review. Under the methodological guidance of Arksey and O'Malley, CTD will be used to map the literature and better understand the elements of integrated care pathways for Black people experiencing TBI. To identify the published literature, several databases will be searched including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. DISCUSSION: The application of CTD compels health-care providers, administrators, clinician-scientists, rehabilitation specialists, and scholars in the field of TBI and integrated care to re-examine hidden assumptions about racism, racialization, and Blackness that are often embedded in current visions of health for all. The health equity lens of CTD asks about who is accounted for in the research and clinical literature and who is absented. It is anticipated that applying the health equity lens of CTD will provide a critical examination of the literature and illuminate significant implications for integrated care for Black persons experiencing TBI. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedBlack or African AmericanEuropeHumansNorth AmericaScoping Reviews as TopicBlackBlacknessCritical transdisciplinaryCritical transdisciplinary scoping reviewIntegrated care pathwaysRacializationRacismTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32482171
PMCPMC7265630
OpenAlexW3030537036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.