Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481538›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Neural Correlates of Modality-Sensitive Deviance Detection in the Audiovisual Oddball Paradigm.

Melissa Randazzo, Ryan Priefer, Paul J Smith, Amanda Nagler, Trey Avery, Karen Froud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa RandazzoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3055-2503
Ryan PrieferDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.
Paul J SmithNeuroscience and Education, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Amanda NaglerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.
Trey AveryNeuroscience and Education, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Karen FroudNeuroscience and Education, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Adelphi University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The McGurk effect, an incongruent pairing of visual /ga/-acoustic /ba/, creates a fusion illusion /da/ and is the cornerstone of research in audiovisual speech perception. Combination illusions occur given reversal of the input modalities-auditory /ga/-visual /ba/, and percept /bga/. A robust literature shows that fusion illusions in an oddball paradigm evoke a mismatch negativity (MMN) in the auditory cortex, in absence of changes to acoustic stimuli. We compared fusion and combination illusions in a passive oddball paradigm to further examine the influence of visual and auditory aspects of incongruent speech stimuli on the audiovisual MMN. Participants viewed videos under two audiovisual illusion conditions: fusion with visual aspect of the stimulus changing, and combination with auditory aspect of the stimulus changing, as well as two unimodal auditory- and visual-only conditions. Fusion and combination deviants exerted similar influence in generating congruency predictions with significant differences between standards and deviants in the N100 time window. Presence of the MMN in early and late time windows differentiated fusion from combination deviants. When the visual signal changes, a new percept is created, but when the visual is held constant and the auditory changes, the response is suppressed, evoking a later MMN. In alignment with models of predictive processing in audiovisual speech perception, we interpreted our results to indicate that visual information can both predict and suppress auditory speech perception.

Indexed as

audiovisualfusionMcGurk effectmismatch negativityN1

Identifiers

PMID32481538
PMCPMC7348766
OpenAlexW3031938118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.