ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Frontal EEG Changes with the Recovery of Carotid Blood Flow in a Cardiac Arrest Swine Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroencephalographic monitoring of brain activity during cardiac arrest: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Review
- Electroencephalographic alpha oscillation as first manifestation of brain restoration after resuscitation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Enhancing cardiac arrest survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: insights into the process of death.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Review
- EEG-Based Prediction of the Recovery of Carotid Blood Flow during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Swine Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring cerebral circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential to improve patients' prognosis and quality of life. We assessed the feasibility of non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG) parameters as predictive factors of cerebral resuscitation in a ventricular fibrillation (VF) swine model. After 1 min untreated VF, four cycles of basic life support were performed and the first defibrillation was administered. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was confirmed if a palpable pulse persisted for 20 min. Otherwise, one cycle of advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) and defibrillation were administered immediately. Successfully defibrillated animals were continuously monitored. If sustained ROSC was not achieved, another cycle of ACLS was administered. Non-ROSC was confirmed when sustained ROSC did not occur after 10 ACLS cycles. EEG and hemodynamic parameters were measured during experiments. Data measured for approximately 3 s right before the defibrillation attempts were analyzed to investigate the relationship between the recovery of carotid blood flow (CBF) and non-invasive EEG parameters, including time- and frequency-domain parameters and entropy indices. We found that time-domain magnitude and entropy measures of EEG correlated with the change of CBF. Further studies are warranted to evaluate these EEG parameters as potential markers of cerebral circulation during CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.