ArticleMedicine2020
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for treating early gastric cancer of undifferentiated-type.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of the effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with gastrectomy on the wound infection in early stomach cancer subjects.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Discrepancies between preoperative assessment and final pathological criteria in early gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated intramucosal gastric cancer regardless of size.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- A population-based study: how to identify high-risk T1 gastric cancer patients?American journal of cancer research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers (EGCs) remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare long-term outcomes of ESD with those of surgery for patients with undifferentiated-type EGCs by a retrospective study.We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent curative ESD or gastrectomy for undifferentiated-type EGCs between 2010 and 2017. Gastric cancers were undifferentiated-type adenocarcinoma without ulceration confined to the mucosal layer and 2 cm or smaller in size. Demographics, complications, recurrence cancer rates, and survival data were collected and compared.Forty patients who underwent curative ESD and 52 patients who underwent surgery were included. The median follow-up duration was 74.6 months. There was no significant difference of metachronous gastric cancer rate (5.0% vs 3.8%, P = .75) or total cancer recurrence rate (10.0% vs 3.8%, P = .33) between the 2 groups. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P = .72, .26, .27 respectively). There were no gastric cancer-related deaths in either group.Long-term outcomes after curative ESD for undifferentiated-type EGCs that met the expanded indication were comparable to that achieved with surgery. ESD without additional surgery is an acceptable choice to treat undifferentiated-type EGCs that meet the curative criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.