Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481453›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Effects of ozone for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Qing Wen, Dongying Liu, Xian Wang, Yanli Zhang, Song Fang, Xianliang Qiu, Qiu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qing WenDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-3927-1823
Dongying Liu
Xian Wang
Yanli Zhang
Song Fang
Xianliang Qiu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of chronically refractory wounds and ulcers is growing rapidly. However, the treatment options are not completely effective. Ozone has been demonstrated as being useful in promoting wound healing as well as adverse events in individual studies. Consequently, it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of high-quality trials to find out whether ozone therapy is effective and safe in these chronic wounds.

methodsWe will search the Cochrane Library, PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, CBM, and the Chinese Clinical Registry website without restriction on language, date, or study setting. Randomized controlled trials of ozone therapy for chronical wounds or ulcers will be retrieved in diverse databases from inception to May 2020. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis is the proportion of participants with completely healed wounds; time to achieve complete ulcer healing; change in wound size. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of adverse events, amputation, quality of life, length of hospital stay, and cost. Two reviewers will adopt the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool to assess the randomized controlled trials and all relevant data will be analyzed by utilizing the Review Manager software V5.3.0.

resultsThis study will offer a high-quality synthesis of the effectiveness and safety of ozone for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers.

conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis will find out the available evidence to assess whether ozone therapy is beneficial to wound healing and side effects, producing evidence reference for clinical practice on the treatment of wound care.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicWound HealingChronic DiseaseHumansOzoneUlcerOzone

Identifiers

PMID32481453
PMCPMC12245291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.