ArticleMedicine2020
Evaluation of predictive role of carcinoembryonic antigen and salivary mRNA biomarkers in gastric cancer detection.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric cancer detection by non-blood-based liquid biopsies: A systematic review looking into the last decade of research.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Pooled it
- Liquid Biopsy: An Emerging Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Review
- Promising applications of human-derived saliva biomarker testing in clinical diagnostics.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- Role of salivary miRNAs in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders: a mini-review of available evidence.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- SPINKs in Tumors: Potential Therapeutic Targets.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- [Precision Medicine in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Gastric Cancer].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explored the potential of combining carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and salivary mRNAs for gastric cancer (GC) detection.This study included 2 phases of study: a biomarker discovery phase and an independent validation phase. In the discovery phase, we measured CEA levels in blood samples and expression level of messenger RNAs (SPINK7, PPL, SEMA4B, SMAD4) in saliva samples of 140 GC patients and 140 healthy controls. We evaluated the clinical performance of each biomarker and developed a predictive model using machine-learning algorithm to differentiate GC patients and healthy controls.Our biomarker panel successfully discriminated GC patients from healthy controls with both high sensitivity (0.94) and high specificity (0.91). We next applied our biomarker panel in the independent validation phase, in which we recruited a new patient cohort of 60 GC patients and 60 healthy controls. Using our biomarker panel, the GC patients were discriminated from healthy controls in the validation phase, with sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.87.A combination of blood CEA and salivary messenger RNA could be a promising approach to detect GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.