Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481423›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Analysis of knowledge bases and research hotspots of coronavirus from the perspective of mapping knowledge domain.

Qiulei Jia, Shuqing Shi, Guozhen Yuan, Jingjing Shi, Shuai Shi, Yuanhui Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. COVID-19 research progress: Bibliometrics and visualization analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiulei JiaCardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Shuqing ShiCardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Guozhen YuanCardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Jingjing ShiCardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Shuai ShiCardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Yuanhui HuCardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Guang’anmen Hospital · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronaviruses have drawn attention since the beginning of the 21st century. Over the past 17 years, coronaviruses have triggered several outbreaks of epidemic in people, which brought great threats to global public health security. We analyzed the publications on coronavirus with bibliometrics software and qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated the knowledge base and hot topics of coronavirus research from 2003 to 2020.

methodsWe explored the publications on coronavirus in the Web of Science core collection (WOSCC) from 2003 to 2020. Bibliometric analysis, evaluating knowledge base, and research hotspots were performed based on CiteSpace V (Drexel University, Chaomei Chen).

resultsThere were a total of 8433 publications of coronavirus. The research on coronavirus boomed when a novel coronavirus triggered outbreaks in people. The leading country was the United States, and the leading institution was the University of Hong Kong. The most productive researchers were: Yuen KY, Drosten C, Baric RS. The keywords analysis showed that SARS-CoV, infection, acute respiratory syndrome, antibody, receptor, and spike protein were research hotspots. The research categories analysis showed that virology, microbiology, veterinary sciences, infectious diseases, and biochemistry and molecular biology were hot research categories.

conclusionsBibliometric analysis of the literature shows the research on coronavirus boomed when a novel coronavirus triggered outbreaks in people. With the end of the epidemic, the research tended to be cooling. Virus identification, pathogenesis, and coronavirus-mediated diseases attracted much attention. We must continue studying the viruses after an outbreak ended.

Indexed as

BibliometricsCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsKnowledge BasesBiomedical ResearchHumansSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID32481423
PMCPMC12245268
OpenAlexW3028918720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.