ArticleMedicine2020
Efficacy of repair and reconstruction therapy for the treatment of lateral ankle ligament injury: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distal insertion rupture of lateral ankle ligament as a predictor of weakened and delayed sports recovery after acute ligament repair: mid-term outcomes of 117 cases.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we will explore the efficacy and safety of repair and reconstruction therapy (RRT) for patients with lateral ankle ligament injury (LALI).
methodsSearches will be carried out in the Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, along with a comprehensive search of grey literature. All databases will be searched from inception to the March 1, 2020 with no restrictions to language and publication status. Two investigators will independently conduct selection of study, information collection, and risk of bias assessment, respectively. A third investigator will help to solve any different opinions between 2 investigators. RevMan 5.3 software will be utilized for statistical analysis.
resultsThis study will assess the efficacy and safety of RRT for patients with LALI through assessing pain intensity, ankle function after ligament injury, time to return to work, time to return to sports, Tegner activity level, quality of life, and adverse events.
conclusionThis study summarizes latest evidence of RRT for patients with LALI and may provide guidance for clinical practice.Study registration number: INPLASY202040082.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.